Close Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Cyber Security
  • Internet of Things
  • Tips and Advice

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Defense Contractor Boss Pleads Guilty to Selling Zero-Day Exploits to

October 30, 2025

Meta Rolls Out New Tools to Protect WhatsApp and Messenger Users from Scams

October 30, 2025

New Atroposia RAT Surfaces on Dark Web

October 30, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Thursday, October 30
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
Cyberwire Daily
  • Home
  • News
  • Cyber Security
  • Internet of Things
  • Tips and Advice
Cyberwire Daily
Home»News»PolarEdge Targets Cisco, ASUS, QNAP, Synology Routers in Expanding Botnet Campaign
News

PolarEdge Targets Cisco, ASUS, QNAP, Synology Routers in Expanding Botnet Campaign

Team-CWDBy Team-CWDOctober 30, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Cybersecurity researchers have shed light on the inner workings of a botnet malware called PolarEdge.

PolarEdge was first documented by Sekoia in February 2025, attributing it to a campaign targeting routers from Cisco, ASUS, QNAP, and Synology with the goal of corralling them into a network for an as-yet-undetermined purpose.

The TLS-based ELF implant, at its core, is designed to monitor incoming client connections and execute commands within them.

Then, in August 2025, attack surface management platform Censys detailed the infrastructural backbone powering the botnet, with the company noting that PolarEdge exhibits characteristics that are consistent with an Operational Relay Box (ORB) network. There is evidence to suggest that the activity involving the malware may have started as far back as June 2023.

In the attack chains observed in February 2025, the threat actors have been observed exploiting a known security flaw impacting Cisco routers (CVE-2023-20118) to download a shell script named “q” over FTP, which is then responsible for retrieving and executing the PolarEdge backdoor on the compromised system.

“The backdoor’s primary function is to send a host fingerprint to its command-and-control server and then listen for commands over a built-in TLS server implemented with mbedTLS,” the French cybersecurity company said in a technical breakdown of the malware.

PolarEdge is designed to support two modes of operation: a connect-back mode, where the backdoor acts as a TLS client to download a file from a remote server, and debug mode, where the backdoor enters into an interactive mode to modify its configuration (i.e., server information) on-the-fly.

The configuration is embedded in the final 512 bytes of the ELF image, obfuscated by a one-byte XOR that can be decrypted with single-byte key 0x11.

However, its default mode is to function as a TLS server in order to send a host fingerprint to the command-and-control (C2) server and wait for commands to be sent. The TLS server is implemented with mbedTLS v2.8.0 and relies on a custom binary protocol for parsing incoming requests matching specific criteria, including a parameter named “HasCommand.”

Encryption algorithms used to obfuscate parts of the backdoor

If the “HasCommand” parameter equals the ASCII character 1, the backdoor proceeds to extract and run the command specified in the “Command” field and transmits back the raw output of the executed command.

Once launched, PolarEdge also moves (e.g., /usr/bin/wget, /sbin/curl) and deletes certain files (“/share/CACHEDEV1_DATA/.qpkg/CMS-WS/cgi-bin/library.cgi.bak”) on the infected device, although the exact purpose behind this step is unclear.

Furthermore, the backdoor incorporates a wide range of anti-analysis techniques to obfuscate information related to the TLS server setup and fingerprinting logic. To evade detection, it employs process masquerading during its initialization phase by choosing from a predefined list a name at random. Some of the names included are: igmpproxy, wscd, /sbin/dhcpd, httpd, upnpd, and iapp.

“Although the backdoor does not ensure persistence across reboots, it calls fork to spawn a child process that, every 30 seconds, checks whether /proc/ still exists,” Sekoia researchers explained. “If the directory has disappeared, the child executes a shell command to relaunch the backdoor.”

The disclosure comes as Synthient highlighted GhostSocks’ ability to convert compromised devices into SOCKS5 residential proxies. GhostSocks is said to have been first advertised under the malware-as-a-service (MaaS) model on the XSS forum in October 2023.

It’s worth noting that the offering has been integrated into Lumma Stealer as of early 2024, allowing customers of the stealer malware to monetize the compromised devices post-infection.

“GhostSocks provides clients with the ability to build a 32-bit DLL or executable,” Synthient said in a recent analysis. “GhostSocks will attempt to locate a configuration file in %TEMP%. In the scenario that the configuration file cannot be found, it will fall back to a hard-coded config.”

The configuration contains details of the C2 server to which a connection is established for provisioning the SOCKS5 proxy and ultimately spawning a connection using the open-source go-socks5 and yamux libraries.



Source

computer security cyber attacks cyber news cyber security news cyber security news today cyber security updates cyber updates data breach hacker news hacking news how to hack information security network security ransomware malware software vulnerability the hacker news
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleOpen Source “b3” Benchmark to Boost LLM Security for Agents
Next Article New Atroposia RAT Surfaces on Dark Web
Team-CWD
  • Website

Related Posts

News

Defense Contractor Boss Pleads Guilty to Selling Zero-Day Exploits to

October 30, 2025
News

Meta Rolls Out New Tools to Protect WhatsApp and Messenger Users from Scams

October 30, 2025
News

New Atroposia RAT Surfaces on Dark Web

October 30, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest News

macOS Stealer Campaign Uses “Cracked” App Lures to Bypass Apple Securi

September 7, 202512 Views

North Korean Hackers Exploit Threat Intel Platforms For Phishing

September 7, 20256 Views

U.S. Treasury Sanctions DPRK IT-Worker Scheme, Exposing $600K Crypto Transfers and $1M+ Profits

September 5, 20256 Views

Ukrainian Ransomware Fugitive Added to Europe’s Most Wanted

September 11, 20255 Views

The risks of unsupported IoT tech

September 11, 20255 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Most Popular

macOS Stealer Campaign Uses “Cracked” App Lures to Bypass Apple Securi

September 7, 202512 Views

North Korean Hackers Exploit Threat Intel Platforms For Phishing

September 7, 20256 Views

U.S. Treasury Sanctions DPRK IT-Worker Scheme, Exposing $600K Crypto Transfers and $1M+ Profits

September 5, 20256 Views
Our Picks

It’s all fun and games until someone gets hacked

September 26, 2025

How the always-on generation can level up their cybersecurity game

September 11, 2025

The hidden risks of browser extensions – and how to avoid them

September 13, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from cyberwiredaily.com

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
© 2025 All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.