Check Point has warned of active exploitation of a critical vulnerability impacting Remote Access VPN and Mobile Access deployments that are configured to use the deprecated IKEv1 key exchange protocol.
The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-50751 (CVSS score: 9.3), is a case of a logic flow weakness in certificate validation that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass user authentication and establish a remote access VPN connection without a valid user password.
“By exploiting a logic flaw in certificate validation, an attacker can establish a VPN session without possession of a valid password, effectively bypassing authentication requirements,” Check Point said. “Additional post-authentication activity is required to access internal resources or escalate privileges.”
The shortcoming impacts the following products and versions –
- Security Gateways R82.10 Jumbo Hotfix Take 19 or below, R82 Jumbo Hotfix Take 103 or below, R81.20 Jumbo Hotfix Take 141 or below, R81.10 (EOS), R81 (EOS), and R80.40 (EOS)
- Spark Firewalls: R80.20.X (EOS), R81.10.X, and R82.00.X
Successful exploitation requires the following conditions to be met –
- VPN Remote Access or Mobile Access is enabled
- IKEv1 is enabled for remote access
- Gateways accept legacy Remote Access clients
- Gateways do not demand a machine certificate for connections
The Israeli cybersecurity company said it first observed indications of suspicious activity on June 4, 2026, with the earliest observed exploitation dating back to May 7, 2026. Exploitation efforts are said to have ramped up starting this month.
The exploitation activity, Check Point added, has been limited to a “few dozen targeted organizations globally.” In one case, the post-exploitation phase has been associated with a Qilin ransomware affiliate.
“We believe that this threat actor infrastructure is exploiting other VPN related vulnerabilities such as the ones published by Palo Alto [Networks], Fortinet, and F5,” it noted. “We identified indicators suggesting the actor may use the Tox protocol for communication, a pattern commonly associated with financially motivated ransomware actors.”
A key aspect is the use of a virtual private server (VPS) infrastructure to conduct the attacks. Specifically, this involves relying on VPS servers geolocated to a particular country to target organizations within its borders. Once access was established, the attackers were found attempting to download malicious ELF files from actor-controlled infrastructure.
Some aspects of these efforts overlap with a report from Ctrl-Alt-Intel last month, which highlighted the ransomware crew’s abuse of corporate VPN appliances for initial access.
“To the best of our knowledge to date, there is no indication the vulnerability was broadly available to other threat actors,” Check Point Research told The Hacker News via email. “The activity is clearly opportunistic and targets vulnerable organizations rather than characterized one.”
Further review of the affected VPN components has uncovered a second vulnerability, CVE-2026-50752 (CVSS score: 7.40), which may allow an adversary-in-the-middle (AitM) attack on VPN site-to-site connections. There is no evidence the flaw has been exploited in real-world attacks.
Update
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), on June 8, 2026,
added
CVE-2026-50751 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, requiring Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to apply the fixes by June 11, 2026.
In a follow-up analysis published on June 12, 2026, watchTowr Labs researcher McCaulay Hudson said the vulnerability allows a connecting client to manipulate authentication flags via a custom VPNExtFeatures Vendor ID payload during IKEv1 negotiation, which could then be escalated into a full authentication bypass.
“The vulnerable iked skips verify_peer_auth/verifyMessagePhase1 (it reads attacker-controlled flags from the VPNExtFeatures Vendor ID, bit 0x4), so neither the certificate’s signature (proof of possession) NOR its trust chain is checked — only that the subject DN [Distinguished Name] resolves to a provisioned user,” Hudson said.
“We forge a self-signed certificate whose subject is CN=
(The story was updated after publication to include a response from Check Point Research and CISA’s addition of the flaw to the KEV catalog.)
